Social Media Needs Its Critics

by ZAC on March 11, 2010

The Value of Curmudgeous

Social media needs curmudgeons. We need critics. In fact, what we need is full-on investigative journalism in the world of social media. There is too much hype–and hyperventilating about the power of social media, the power of these new tools and the benefits to our weakened culture.

Of course, I am guilty of the above hyperbole. Thinking back I am reminded of how many blog posts I’ve started with the whole “Social media is revolutionizing our culture at large” blather. Well, no more. Or at least not as much. Even though I do believe that by hook or by crook social media is remapping our culture, our society and empowering people, I also believe that somewhere beneath all this gloss and sheen there is a seedier underbelly to social media. And I’m not just talking about all those “social media gurus” read: snake-oil salesman. That phenomenon is just the beginning.

The reason that social media needs critics and, as I said, full on investigative journalism, is not, as one would expect, to weaken or harm the world of social media. In fact, we need these functions being performed in order to strengthen social media for the long run. A free and unfettered press improves democracy. We all need to see what goes on beneath the blogs and twitter accounts. Does anyone doubt that malfeasance occurs, that ethics are being corrupted? Does anyone doubt that people are being scammed? Does anyone doubt that there are large sums of money being made in less than savory, even illegal, ways?

Who Can Investigate Social Media?

How about all those journalists who have lost their jobs recently? Of course this is only a partial answer but it is clear there are a lot of talented journalists who are sitting out these days, navel gazing and trying to figure out what happened to their jobs, their way of life, their industry.

I believe that journalists with experience in national security, local politics, foreign affairs, the areas where newspapers have been hardest hit, can be extremely valuable as checks upon the growing reach and influence of social media. The same skills of investigation, news gathering, reportage, narrative are important to social media.

And as social media investigations develop, more and more people will become aware. I think one thing these journalists will soon learn is that social media is a very closed world. What’s more, social media likes nothing more than to read about…social media. It’s why sites like Mashable are so popular. They are cheerleaders for social media. And that’s not a bad thing. Social media needs its cheerleaders, it needs it celebrators, but just as well it needs it critics.

And of course, it does have its critics. Plenty of sites and blogs these days take it upon themselves to burst bubbles and poke fun at the buzz and hype surrounding social media. But I can’t really think of any newspapers that are taking on social media directly in the same way they would an investigation in the Pentagon’s misuse of funds, or a politician’s schemings. This is what we should begin to see.

And when these investigations do appear, they’ll be vastly more popular than people think. The truth is even the loudest cheerleaders and evangelists for social media know there is a long way to go before we realize the full potential. Social media for all its gains, is still not mainstream. There are millions of American’s who just don’t see the point.

Investigative reporting in the social media sphere is one way that they’ll begin to see the context. With great stories, even of malfeasance, social media will appear as something real, something tangible. And that is something that we should all want.

Image Source: on Flickr

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

Digidave March 11, 2010 at 1:12 pm

I fully agree and mostly point to the tech blogs for failing us thus far.

Mashable, TechCrunch, Valleywag, Gizmodo, etc.

The majority of what they do is fanboism.

Occasionally we get some really good stuff. BusinessInsider did an AWESOME investigation into the origins of Facebook: http://www.businessinsider.com/how-facebook-was-founded-2010-3

And indeed what they found were questionable and ethical problems in how Facebook, a site most of us have heard of, got started – including questionable practices by its founder.

Anyways: Often these sites are themselves hype machines. The problem being that they have a dog in the race (I believe) – They have to be rah-rah.

Reply

Zachary Adam Cohen March 11, 2010 at 1:19 pm

Indeed, I loved the Dennis Yu piece on TechCrunch awhile back about how he talked about how he used unethical practices in Facebook Spam Ads. I think that was what I had in mind when I realized that there needs to be some hard hitting investigations. I did read that BI piece and also recognize the value there.

You are right in that Techcrunch, ValleyWag, Mashable have dogs in this race and therefore can’t put themselves in the position of criticizing the very world that pays their bills, but at the same time, simply because they are new media companies, they should be able to more quickly realize the long term sustainable value in keeping their industry as clean as possible, from as early as possible.

They seem to be adopting the mentality of the very institutions they are replacing or upending.

Thanks as always for your valuable commentary Dave. You are always welcome here and its always a thrill when you come by.

Z

Reply

Zachary Adam Cohen March 11, 2010 at 1:16 pm

Indeed, I loved the Dennis Yu piece on TechCrunch awhile back about how he talked about how he used unethical practices in Facebook Spam Ads. I think that was what I had in mind when I realized that there needs to be some hard hitting investigations. I did read that BI piece and also recognize the value there.

You are right in that Techcrunch, ValleyWag, Mashable have dogs in this race and therefore can’t put themselves in the position of criticizing the very world that pays their bills, but at the same time, simply because they are new media companies, they should be able to more quickly realize the long term sustainable value in keeping their industry as clean as possible, from as early as possible.

They seem to be adopting the mentality of the very institutions they are replacing or upending.

Thanks as always for your valuable commentary Dave. You are always welcome here and its always a thrill when you come by.

Z

Reply

Eric March 11, 2010 at 5:12 pm

Yes, yes, yes. I’ve been thinking about this, but in a much more roundabout and considerably less eloquent way. We definitely need critics, but I think we also just need objectivism. All these social media circles are just high on this stuff, and their feet are nowhere near the ground. It’s quite the bandwagon social media has created, and we need people who will jump off and have a look at it while standing on their own two feet.
.-= Eric´s last blog ..How to breed customer evangelists in social media communities =-.

Reply

bob ashley March 12, 2010 at 12:34 am

A well-wrought post! Any discipline worthwhile studying boasts a mature critical community–philosophy, literature, art. Yours is a rare instance that understands that critics are sensitive interpreters or diagnosticians with a genuine motive to advance that which he/she studies.

Critics that merely judge are ultimately judged. Judgments always reflect the psychoses of the critic’s own era, and as such are soon forgotten.

A well-thought post!

Bob

Reply

Zachary Adam Cohen March 12, 2010 at 12:38 am

Bob

that is precisely what I hope to provoke. As an evangelist of sorts, I recognize that without critical attention, social media will remain a hyped-up word and community of tools. Sunlight is indeed the best disinfectant.

Thanks for the comment and the read.

Z

Reply

Tom Lewis March 12, 2010 at 4:16 pm

Excellent post Zachary. As a user and mostly fan of social media, I find myself stepping back and looking with a critic’s eye frequently. As useful, and often, powerful as tools like Twitter can be there are limitations as well. Each person and organization has to constantly evaluate not only best practices but whether the costs in time and effort are worth the benefits they bring.

Keep thinking and writing my friend!

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 12 trackbacks }

Previous post: Spy vs Spy: Competition and Brainstorming in Social Media

Next post: My Biggest Fear